SMT. BINDU SHARMA vs KAPIL SUD AND ANR

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : 09.02.2026 Date of decision: 25.03.2026 FAO(OS) 3/2026 & CM APPL. 2934/2026 SMT. BINDU SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Ms. Sunanda Tulsyan, Ms. Kashish Maheshwari and Ms. Babita Rawat, Advocates. versus KAPIL SUD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Tamali Wad, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohit, Ms. Harshita, Mr. Karan, Mr. Varyam, Ms. Palak, Mr. SD Singh, Ms.Kamla, Mr. Sidharth, Mr. Manan, Advocates for Defendant No-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR JUDGMENT 1. The present appeal has been preferred under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, assailing the Order dated 24.11.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in CS(OS) 84/2019 whereby I.A. No. 16481/2023 filed by Respondent No.2 under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) was allowed and Respondent No.2 was permitted to amend his Written Statement by substantially altering the admissions earlier made therein. 2. The underlying suit has been instituted by the Appellant/Plaintiff seeking declaration, partition, permanent injunction and rendition of accoun