SHRI VIRENDER KAUSHIK vs SATISH JINDAL

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 25.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 24.03.2026 Judgment uploaded on: 24.03.2026 + RFA (COMM) 518/2024 & CM APPL. 70331/2024 SHRI VIRENDER KAUSHIK .....Appellant Through: Mr.Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate. versus SATISH JINDAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Bhagat Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.: 1. By way of the present Appeal, the Appellant seeks to assail the judgment and decree dated 05.07.2024 and 19.09.2024 [hereinafter referred to as „IJ/D‟], passed by the learned District Judge [hereinafter referred to as „LDJ‟], Rohini Courts, Delhi, whereby the recovery suit filed by the Respondent (Plaintiff before the LDJ) came to be decreed in his favour in exercise of powers conferred upon the LDJ under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as „CPC‟], holding that the Appellant (Defendant before the LDJ) had made admissions sufficient to warrant a judgment and decree on admission. 2. For the sake of clarity, consistency and ease of reference, the parties in the present appeal shall be referred to in accordance with Signature Not Verified Signed By:JAI NARAYAN Signing Date:24.03.2026 RFA(COMM) 518/2024 Page 1 of 9 11:52:55 their respective status before the LDJ. FACTUAL MATRIX: 3. In order to comprehend the issues falling for the consideration before this Bench, relevant facts are required to be noticed. 4. The dispute before this Court finds its genesis in the registered lease deed dated 16.05.2014, executed between the parties with respect to the property bearing shop no. 9A at Apra Plaza, Plot No.29, Road No. 44 Pitampura, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as „suit property‟], for a