SHIVANSHU AGGARWAL vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 18th March, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 866/2026 SHIVANSHU AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikrant Arora, Advocate (through V.C.). Petitioner in person. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for the State with Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate. SI Prabhash Kumar Singh and SI Sanjay Nain. Respondent No.2 through V.C. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner herein seeks quashing of FIR No. 0172/2022 dated 04.03.2022, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, for commission of offences under Sections 341/323/506 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Apparently, as per the bare allegations, it seems to be a case of road-rage. Complainant, a senior citizen, was driving Innova Car when all of sudden, accused (petitioner herein) came on a bullet motorcycle and parked his motorcycle in front of the abovesaid car. He abused the complainant and Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA W.P.(CRL) 866/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:19.03.2026 18:58:49 then gave him a fist blow on his face and left while threatening him. 3. It was in the face of abovesaid allegations made by the complainant, the FIR was registered for commission of said offences. 4. Charge-sheet has already been filed and the charges have also been framed for offences under Sections 341/323/506 IPC. 5. Fact, however, remains that when the complainant entered into witness box though he reiterated the allegations but also deposed that he wanted to compromise the matter. 6. It was in the abovesaid backdrop that the present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the FIR. 7. Respondent No.2