Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-03-12

SH P K CHAWLA vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
RFA-1158/2025 2026:DHC:2065
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SH P K CHAWLA
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 07th January, 2026 Pronounced on: 12th March, 2026 RFA 1158/2025 & CM APPL. 80384/2025 SH. P.K. CHAWLA (Aged about 79 years) S/o Sh. B.L. Chawla, R/o B-119, Shivalik, New Delhi Presently at: R/o J.P. Aman, Flat No. 1803, Sector-141, Tower No. 12, Noida, U.P. .....Appellant Through: Mr. M.D. Jangra, Advocate. versus 1. UNION OF INDIA (substituted as P/f vide Order dated 17.04.2018 in place of Organizing Committee Commonwealth Games 2010, Delhi) Through the Secretaries, Department of Sports, Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. GP. CAPT. KUK REDDY (Impleaded as D/f vide Order dated 07.04.2014) Flat No. C 22, S.S. Apartment, Sector-9, Dwarka, New Delhi. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Udit Dedhiya, SPC with Mr.Shivam Sharma, GP, Ms. Apurva Sachdev and Mr. Preyansh Gupta, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA RFA1158/2025 Page 1 of 23 Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:13.03.2026 13:12:29 J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. CM APPL. 80385/2025 1. The Appellant has filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act r/w Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as „CPC‟) seeking Condonation of Delay of 28 days in filing the Appeal against the Judgment dated 30.07.2025. 2. It is stated that the Appellant a senior citizen applied for certified copy of the entire Trial court record and the impugned Judgment, on 22.09.2025 which were supplied on 18.10.2025. Thereafter, he approached the Counsel on 25.10.2025 and the Appeal was prepared after examining the voluminous record and filed in the second week of November, 2025. It is submitted that the time consumed in obtaining certified copied deserves exclusion an

SH P K CHAWLA vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER · Niyam