SATBIR NEGI ALIAS SATVEER SINGH & ORS. vs THE SATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 09th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 1674/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6791/2026 SATBIR NEGI ALIAS SATVEER SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mani Mishra, Advocate aloing with petitioners-in-person versus THE SATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for State with SI Sunita Respondent no. 2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Present petition has been received on transfer. 2. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No.244/2019, registered at police station Pul Prahlad Pur for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/323/506/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) and petitioner No.1 was solemnized on 11.11.2016, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. 4. However, due to certain temperamental differences, the parties could not live together and started living separately w.e.f. 24.07.2018. There is no issue from the aforesaid wedlock. 5. On the basis of report lodged by respondent no. 2, abovesaid FIR was registered. Signature Not Verified CRL.M.C. 1674/2026 1 Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:11.03.2026 17:25:05 6. After completion of investigation, though the charge-sheet has been filed, charges are yet to be ascertained 7. Fact remains that when the matter was referred to Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi, parties were able to sort out their all differences as would be apparent from Mediation Order dated 15.04.2025 and the parties have agreed to part ways in a graceful manner. 8. Respondent no. 2 is present in person and is duly identified by IO. 9. Respondent no. 2 reitera