Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-03-18

SANJAY CHAUHAN & ORS. vs THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) THROUG S.H.O P.S. VIJAY VIHAR & ANR.

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-1967/2026 2026:DHC:2275
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SANJAY CHAUHAN & ORS.
Respondent
THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) THROUG S.H.O P.S. VIJAY VIHAR & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 18.03.2026 CRL.M.C. 1967/2026 & CRL.M.A. 8089/2026 SANJAY CHAUHAN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Neeraj Chauhan, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) THROUG S.H.O P.S. VIJAY VIHAR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Rajesh Kumar Mr. Subhash Pal, Advocate with respondent no. 2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 1277/2017 of PS Vijay Vihar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits that State has no objection. 3. Respondent no. 2 present in person and identified by IO/SI Ravinder CRL.M.C. 1967/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 4. I have spoken with both sides in Hindi and it is stated by them that now they have compromised all their disputes