Delhi High Court · 2026-03-13
ROSHAN AND ORS vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
- Citation / case number
- CRL.M.C.-1823/2026 2026:DHC:2191
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- ROSHAN AND ORS
- Respondent
- THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Judgment text excerpt
$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 13th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 1823/2026 & CRL.M.A. 7501/2026 ROSHAN AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abid Ibrahim with Mr. Rahul Kumar and Mr. Adnan Khan, Advocates with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State Mr. S.Y. Usmani, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 295/2024 dated 06.05.2024, registered at Police Station Palam Village, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 of IPC, along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. The marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 was solemnized on 19.03.2017, as per Muslim rites and ceremonies. There is no child from the abovesaid wedlock. 3. However, on account of some temperamental differences between the parties, they started residing separately since 2021 and on the basis of report lodged by respondent no. 2, abovesaid FIR was registered. 4. The charge-sheet has already been filed, albeit, charges are yet to be Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 1823/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:16.03.2026 17:47:48 ascertained. 5. However, when the parties were referred to Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, they came to an amicable solution and agreed to part ways in a graceful manner as would be apparent from Mediation Order dated 01.07.2025. Parties have already taken divorce by way of Mubarat Nama on 26.11.2025 and a certificate to the abovesaid effect has also been placed on record. 6. Petitioners are present in Court. 7. Respondent No.2