ROHIT SHARMA & ANR. vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2088/2025 ROHIT SHARMA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Deepak Parashar, Advocate P-1 (Through VC) P-2-in-person versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for State/R-1 SI Ashok, PS Anand Vihar Respondents-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 332/2022 dated 12.07.2022, registered at Police Station Anand Vihar for commission of offences under Sections 308/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Charge-sheet has already been filed for commission of offences under Sections 308/326/34 IPC. 3. Aforesaid FIR was registered on the complaint given by Mr. Mohit Khanna, who revealed that on 12.07.2022, he and his brother Mr. Gaurav Khanna were going to Cross River Mall in a car when two persons came on a scooty. Scooty was being driven in a very rash and negligent manner. There was collision between scooty and aforesaid car which resulted in scuffle and injuries were inflicted upon Mr. Gaurav Khanna. Signature Not Verified CRL.M.C. 2088/2025 1 Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:25.03.2026 16:20:31 4. Fact, however, remains that thereafter, parties have been able to bury their differences with the intervention of respectable Bar members, family members and friends. Terms of settlement have been duly recorded Settlement Deed dated 11.02.2026. The petitioners have agreed to compensate opposite party with respect to the incident in question and have decided to reimburse the medical expenditure borne by them. A sum of Rs. 8.10 lacs has already been paid to them. Resp