Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-03-24

ROHAN BOOK COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED vs SACHIN TYAGI

Citation / case number
RFA-847/2024 2026:DHC:2460
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ROHAN BOOK COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent
SACHIN TYAGI

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:30th January, 2026 Pronounced on: 24th March, 2026 + RFA 847/2024,CM APPL. 71003/2024, CM APPL. 71006/2024 ROHAN BOOK COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through its Authorized Representative NITIN S/o- Late Madan Pal R/o-C-178, First Floor, Anand Vihar, Delhi- 110092 Email id: [email protected] Through: Ms. Aishwarya Raj, Advocate Versus SACHIN TYAGI .....Respondent R/o House No. 666 D-Block, Street No.-4 Ashok Nagar, Shahdara New Delhi-110093 Email id: [email protected] Mobile: 07303375354 Through: Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. CM APPL. 71003/2024 (delay of 132days in filing the appeal) Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIKAS RFA 847/2024 Page 1 of 15 ARORA Signing Date:24.03.2026 17:04:00 1. This application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 132 days in filing the Appeal. 2. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 132 days in filing the Appeal, is condoned. 3. The Application is disposed of, accordingly. CM APPL. 71006/2024 (delay 18 days in re-filing appeal) 4. This Application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 18 days in re-filing the Appeal. 5. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 18 days in re- filing the Appeal, is condoned. 6. The said Application is disposed of, accordingly. RFA 847/2024: 7. The Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) has been preferred by the Appellant challenging the Order dated 08.02.2024,of the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, whereby the Suit of the Appellant seeking damages for defamation, was rejected under Order VII Rule 11(a

ROHAN BOOK COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED vs SACHIN TYAGI · Niyam