Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-03-16

RITU GUPTA vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-1044/2026 2026:DHC:2181
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RITU GUPTA
Respondent
STATE (NCT OF DELHI
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 16.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1044/2026 & CRL.M.A. 7888/2026 RITU GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Gupta, Utkarsh Tiwari, Mr. Akash Gupta and Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Tilak Raj. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 152/2025 of Police Station Special Cell for offence under Section 308/318(4)/319 of BNS. 2. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for the State assisted by IO/SI Tilak Raj. 3. Broadly speaking, the prosecution case is that the accused/applicant, along with two co-accused persons, namely, Shiv Shankar and Banwari Lal committed cyber fraud by carrying out digital arrest of the complainant de facto, who is an old aged lady. The FIR was registered online, after which BAIL APPLN. 1044/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH 4. Learned counsel for accused/applicant does not dispute that a sum of Rs. 40,00,000/- was credited in the bank account of the accused/ap