Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-03-25

RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.

Citation / case number
CONT.CAS(C)-88/2025 2026:DHC:2663
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN
Respondent
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 25.03.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 88/2025 RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Jain and Ms. Gauri Vashisht, Advocates alongwith Petitioner. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ......Respondents Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy, SC for DDA with Mr. Gautam Yadav, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilful disobedience/non-compliance with the directions contained in the order dated 03.10.2024 in W.P.(C) 11037/2022. The operative directions therein are as under: “23. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed. Accordingly, the following reliefs are granted to the petitioner; (i) A writ of mandamus is issued to the respondents to issue an allotment letter to the petitioner pursuant to draw of lots of allotment of MIG plot bearing no.D-2/49, Sector 29 against the Registration No.234252, Priority No.14953 under MIG category in RRS, 1981 conducted on 28.10.2016, within two months from today; (ii) AND simultaneously a direction is issued to the respondents/DDA to hand over the physical possession of the MIG plot bearing no. D- 2/49, Sector 29 against the Registration No.234252, Priority No.14953 in terms of the aforesaid details to the petitioner within two months from today; Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 88/2025 Page 1 of 4 By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Date:01.04.2026 14:46:25 (iii) In the alternative, in case the aforesaid plot has been allotted to any third person in the interregnum, the respondents/DDA shall allot a plot of equivalent size in the same sector i.e. Sector 29, to the petitioner at the rates of land prevailing at the time of computerized draw of lots i.e

RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. · Niyam