RAVIKANT ALIAS BITTU AND ANR vs GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 18th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2747/2025 RAVIKANT ALIAS BITTU AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Kar and Mr. A Nayak, Advocates for P-1 Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta, Advocate for P-2. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP with SI Lokesh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. When the matter was taken up on the last date hearing i.e. on 17.02.2026, the following facts were recorded:- “1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No.1067/2014 dated 10.10.2014, registered at P.S. Govind Puri, for commission of offences under Sections 186/353/332/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. As per FIR, the obstruction and assault was upon three public servants, who were MCD workers. 3. Two such workers i.e. Mr. Chander Pal (respondent No.2) and Mr. Rajinder (respondent No.3) are present. One another MCD employee i.e. Sunil, later on, expired and his death has also been duly verified. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the settlement dated 29.03.2025 is amicable and unconditional. However, he states that he would try to contact the surviving LRs of Sunil also. 5. I.O. would be at liberty to contact the LRs/family members of Sunil so that their version is also considered on the next date of hearing. 6. The statements of respondent Nos.2 and 3 have already been recorded by learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) on 24.04.2025 wherein they have Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 2747/2025 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:19.03.2026 19:03:58 reiterated the terms of the settlement. Today also, when asked, they reiterated that they do not wis