RAMESH vs STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 10.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 918/2026, CRL.M.A. 6958/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6959/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6960/2026 RAMESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhakar Tiwari, Mr. Ajay Kr. Srivastav and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocates versus STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Rajak Ahmad CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 357/2024 of Police Station Chitranjan Park for offence under Section 309(6)/310(2)/311/317(3)/61(2)/3(5) BNS and Section 25/27 of the Arms Act. 2. Learned APP for the State accepts notice. 3. On behalf of accused/applicant, it is contended that all remaining co- accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court on different dates after detailed discussion comparing the contents of the belated FIR in BAIL APPLN. 918/2026 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569 af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH Signature Not Verified COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557099 6b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally Signed Date: 2026.03.10 17:21:57 -07'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:10.03.2026 17:40:58 the light of the different CCTV footages produced. On ground of parity, the accused/applicant claims bail. 4. Learned APP submits that this is not a case of parity because the snatched anklet was recovered from the present accused/applicant. It is contended that co-accused Waris had snatched the anklet and handed it over to the present accused/applicant. 5. I have examined the different ord