RAM UGRAH SHARMA vs KANCHAN MALA

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 21st January, 2026 Pronounced on: 12th March, 2026 RFA 68/2026 & CM APPL. NOS. 4172/2026, 4173/2026, 4174/2026 RAM UGRAH SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Bhardwaj S. Iyengar, Advocate. versus KANCHAN MALA .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. CM APPL. 4174/2026 (delay of 36 days in refiling) 1. An Application has been filed by the Appellant seeking condonation of delay of 36 days in re-filing the Appeal. 2. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 36 days in re-filing the Appeal, is condoned. 3. The Application is disposed of, accordingly. CM APPL. 4173/2026 (for enlargement of time to deposit Court fees) 4. The present application has been filed by the Appellant seeking enlargement of time to deposit the court fee amounting to ₹1,00,084/-. At the outset, it is noticed that the requisite court fee on the present appeal has not been 5. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read withOrder XLI Rule 1of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) has been preferred by the Appellant challenging the Judgme