Bombay High Court · 2026-03-27
RAJKUMAR CHANDRASEN CHAVAN vs MANAGING DIRECTOR CIDCO LIMITED
- Citation / case number
- WP/14359/2024
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- RAJKUMAR CHANDRASEN CHAVAN
- Respondent
- MANAGING DIRECTOR CIDCO LIMITED
Judgment text excerpt
2026:BHC-AS:15409-DB Bhogale 902.wp-14359-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.14359 OF 2024 Shri Rajkumar Chandrasen Chavan Age: 61 years Occupation : Business/Agriculturist, Harihareshwar, Post Harihareshwar, Taluka Shriwardhan, District Raigad, Maharashtra - 402 110 … Petitioner Versus 1. Managing Director For CIDCO Limited, CIDCO Bhavan, CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai - 400 614 2. Assistant Estate Officer, Kharghar, CIDCO Nodal Office, Sector-4, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai 410 210 3. Senior Development Officer, 1st Floor, CIDCO, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai - 410 210 4. Law Officer Legal Department CIDCO Bhavan, CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai - 400 614 5. Advocate Pravin Pisal, Court Commissioner, Shop no.125, Mahanagar Palika Co. Near Vasudev Balwant Phadke Natygruh, Panvel, Raigad - 410 206 1 Bhogale 902.wp-14359-2024.odt 6. Minister for Urban Development Having office at 4th Floor, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 020 7. Additional Chief Secretary of Urban Development Having office at 4th Floor, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 020. .… Respondents **** Adv. Rohan Surve a/w. Adv. Shrushti Vishwakarma, Adv. Shivank Singh i/b. Adv. Yogesh B. Dandekar, for the petitioner. Mr. G. S. Hegde, Senior Advocate a/w Adv. P. M. Bhansali, Adv. Ganesh Bajpei, for the respondent-CIDCO. Mr. N. C. Walimbe, Addl.G.P. a/w Mr. S. P. Kamble, AGP, for the respondent-State. **** CORAM : M. S. KARNIK & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 27th MARCH, 2026 JUDGMENT (PER M. S. KARNIK, J.) : 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the demand notice dated 25/06/2024 and 27/06/2024 issued by the respondent No.2-City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited ("CIDCO", for short). 2 Bhogale 902.wp-14359-2024.odt 2. The facts of the case i