RAJIV PARASHAR vs GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 17th March, 2026. Uploaded on: 18th March, 2026. + W.P.(C) 3401/2026 & CM APPL. 16333/2026, CM APPL. 16334/2026 RAJIV PARASHAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Sharma, Mr. Nalin Yadav & Ms. Arushi Singh, Advs. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner – Mr. Rajiv Parashar under Article 226 of the Constitution of India inter alia for issuance of appropriate directions to the Respondents. 3. The Petitioner, who is a member of the Canara CGHS Ltd. (hereinafter ‘Society’) has filed this writ petition raising various grievances in respect of the functioning of the Society. 4. It is the case of the Petitioner that since 2023, there have been disputes in respect of the audit of the Society and the Petitioner has made repeated representations in this regard. 5. The Registrar Cooperative Societies (hereinafter, ‘RCS’) has also been looking into the alleged violations of the Society and has directed cooperation Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 3401/2026 Page 1 of 3 By:DEVANSHU JOSHI Signing Date:18.03.2026 15:22:55 by the Society with the Special Auditor appointed by the RCS. 6. The chronology of events reveals that there are repeated orders passed by the RCS in regard to the alleged violations and repeated representations have been made by the Petitioner. Several reports have also been furnished by the Special Auditor stating that there is a deficiency in the documents and there has been non-cooperation by the Society. 7. The Petitioner had also filed a writ petition