RAJEEV MIGLANI vs URMIL GUJRAL & ORS

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 16thDecember, 2025 Pronounced on: 27th March, 2026 RFA 545/2016 RAJEEV MIGLANI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ashim Vachher, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Saiba. M. Rajpal, Advocate (M:9910946849) versus URMIL GUJRAL & Anr. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Ms. Anshika Juneja, Advocates for R-1 (M:9877135434) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA JUDGEMENT MINI PUSHKARNA, J. Introduction: 1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), against the judgment and decree dated 02nd March, 2016 (“impugned judgment”), passed by the Court of Additional District Judge (“ADJ”) – 09, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Suit No. 258/14 (Old Suit No. 179/06), titled as ―Smt. Urmal Gujral Versus Sh. Som Nath & Ors.‖. 2. The aforesaid suit was instituted under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (“Specific Relief Act”) by the plaintiff/respondent no. 1 herein, i.e., Smt. Urmil Gujral, inter alia, seeking a declaration that the 2006. 3. The Trial Court, vide the impugned judgment, decreed the suit and passed a decree of declaration in favour of the respondent no. 1 and