Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-03-24

RAJAN AHUJA vs STATE AND ANR

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-6613/2023 2026:DHC:2476
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAJAN AHUJA
Respondent
STATE AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 24th March, 2026 CRL.M.C. 6613/2023, CRL.M.A. 8476/2026 & CRL.M.A. 8477/2026 RAJAN AHUJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj and Mr. Naman Arora, Advocates (DHCLSC) versus STATE AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for State/R-1 with SI Divya, PS Kishangarh Mr. Rohit Rattu, Advocate for complainant/R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The situation is little unusual here. 2. Applicant is facing trial in case FIR No. 402/2022 dated 30.08.2022, registered at Police Station Kishan Garh for commission of offences under Sections 354(A)/354(D)/509 IPC. 3. He sought bail and vide order dated 27.03.2023, learned Court of Sessions granted him bail. While granting bail, learned Court of Sessions observed as under: - “In the opinion of the Court, the allegations of the accused that he has been falsely implicated at the behest of the complainant cannot be dismissed at the threshold, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the contentions of both sides, this Court is of the opinion that custodial detention of the accused is not required in fact and circumstances