PREETI GUPTA vs M/S BIKRAM TRADERS

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 27th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 9th March, 2026 + RC.REV. 297/2023 PREETI GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Kumar Sharma, Adv. versus M/S BIKRAM TRADERS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shubham Budhiraja, Adv. + RC.REV. 299/2023 PREETI GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Kumar Sharma, Adv. versus M/S EMKAY TRADERS .....Respondent Through: None. + RC.REV. 300/2023 PREETI GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Kumar Sharma, Adv. versus PRAKASH CHAND PERIWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shubham Budhiraja, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA Signature Not Verified Signed By:BHASKAR RC.REV. 297/2023 & conn. Page 1 of 16 SINGH RAWAT Signing Date:10.03.2026 09.37 AMIT SHARMA, J. 1. These petitions have been taken up for hearing and are being disposed of by way of present common judgment as the issue arisen in the impugned orders is same. The present petitions under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, (for short, ‘DRCA’) have been filed assailing the impugned orders of even date 27.03.2023 passed by learned CCJ-cum-ARC, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in eviction petitions filed on behalf of the petitioner-landlord against the respondents-tenants with respect to their respective tenanted premises which are stated to have been owned by the petitioner herein. 2. In the eviction petitions, it was stated by the petitioner that the erstwhile owner of the property was Smt. Raj Kumari Verma, who had executed GPA and Gift Deed in favour of her son, Ashok Kumar Verma vide document dated 16.08.1995. Thereafter, said Ashok Kumar Verma executed a Will dated 28.01.2005 along with other relevant documents in favour of Anil Gupta, husband of the petitioner. Ashok Kumar Verma passed away on