Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-03-13

PRATIBHA THAKUR vs GOVT OF NCT DELHI THROUGH SHO PS VIJAY VIHAR

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-3115/2024 2026:DHC:2104
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
PRATIBHA THAKUR
Respondent
GOVT OF NCT DELHI THROUGH SHO PS VIJAY VIHAR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 13.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 3115/2024 PRATIBHA THAKUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Arora, Advocate. versus GOVT OF NCT DELHI THROUGH SHO PS VIJAY VIHAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State IO/SI Arun Kumar. + BAIL APPLN. 3508/2024 NITIN KAUSHIK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rana Sandeep and Mr. Vivek Pahan, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State IO/SI Arun Kumar. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicants seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 349/2021 of Police Station Vijay Vihar for offence under Section 420/463/464/465/468 IPC. BAIL APPLNS 3115/2024 & 3508/2024 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4556 9af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH 2. These anticipatory bail applications came up for the first hearing on 30.08.2024 and 27.09.2024 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Initially, the predecessor bench granted protection to the accused/applicants from arrest but subsequently, on being informed that the accused/ap