PANKAJ VAID vs ICICI BANK LIMITED & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 08th January, 2026 Pronounced on: 13th March, 2026 + RFA 976/2025 & CM APPL. 21122-24/2024 PANKAJ VAID S/o Sh. H.K. Vaid, R/o 488, Jheel Khuranja .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ayush Negi, Advocate versus 1. ICICI BANK LIMITED ICICI Bank Tower, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai-400051 Through its managing director 2. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, Human Resource Management Group, ICICI Bank Limited, ICICI Bank Towed, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai .....Respondents Through: Dr. M. Y. Khan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. CM APPL. 21123/2024: 1. An Application under Section 5 of Limitation Act, has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 168 days, in filing the present Appeal. 2. For the reasons stated in the Application, delay is condoned. RFA 976/2025 Page 1 of 7 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:13.03.2026 18:26:51 3. The Application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 21124/2024: 4. Application under Section 5 of Limitation Act has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 40 days, in re-filing the present Appeal. 5. For the reasons stated in the Application, delay is condoned. 6. The Application stands disposed of. RFA 976/2025, CM APPL. 21122/2024: 7. Regular First Appeal under Order XLI read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as „CPC‟) has been filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.05.2023, whereby the Suit of the Plaintiff has been partially decreed for Rs.35,000/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from 07.07.2009 until realization as salary for the month of June, 2009, while his other reliefs for damages and reinstatement, were dismissed.