Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-03-28

NEC CORPORATION vs ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS

Citation / case number
C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT)-486/2022 2026:DHC:2598
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
NEC CORPORATION
Respondent
ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 28.03.2026 C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 486/2022 NEC CORPORATION .....Appellant versus ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS ....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Vineet Rohilla, Mr. Rohit Rangi, Ms. Vaishali Joshi and Ms. Gurneer Chawla, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Varun Pratap Singh, Mr. Dev Pratap and Mr. Yogya Bhatia, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA JUDGMENT TEJAS KARIA, J INTRODUCTION 1. This is an Appeal filed under Section 117A(2) of the Patents Act, 1970 (“Act”) seeking quashing and setting aside of order dated 21.06.2022 (“Impugned Order”) passed by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs (“Respondent / Controller”) under Section 15 of the Act refusing the Patent Application No. 201717010986 filed on 28.03.2017 titled as “VIDEO CODING DEVICE, VIDEO DECODING DEVICE, VIDEO 2. On 15.10.2014, the Appellant filed the Japan Patent Application No. 2014-204392 (“JP Application”). On 12.08.2015, the Appellant filed the Paris Cooperation Treaty Patent Application No. PCT/JP2015/004037 (“PCT Application”), which claimed pri