MOHANDAS VELUKUTTY vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3670/2026 Date of Decision: 23.03.2026 IN THE MATTER OF: MOHANDAS VELUKUTTY .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC with Ms. Gurleen Kaur Waraich, Mr. Kritarth Upadhyay, Mr. Amulya Dev Mishra Advocates for R-1 to 5. Mr Ajay Pal, Law Officer, Insp Athurv and Mr Ramniwas Yadav, CRPF. Mr. Swastik Singh, Mr. Atul Singh, Mr. B.K Wadhwa, Ms. Nidhi Tyagi and Ms. Pratima Nasa, Advocates for R-6 to 11. Mr Anshuman Amaresh for R-11. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs: Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Signed By:AMIT KUMAR Signed SHARMA Signing Date:25.03.2026 By:PURUSHAINDRA 13:18:10 W.P.(C) 3670/2026 Page 1 of 4 KUMAR KAURAV “1. Issue an appropriate Writ of Prohibition, restraining Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 (Ministry of Home Affairs, Delhi Police, and Ministry of Defence) from continuing any official affiliation, participation, or allowing the use of their institutional names, emblems, and authority by the Respondent private company (Karate India Organisation) or its office bearers (Respondent Nos. 6 to 11) during the pendency of existing criminal investigations and statutory inquiries. 2. Issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing Respondent No. 4 (Ministry of Corporate Affairs) to expeditiously complete the ordered inquiry and inspection into the affairs of the Respondent companys regarding the alleged misuse of its Section 8 (Non-Profit) license for commercial activities, benami transactions, and illegal wealth accumulation, and to take appropriate regulatory action, including th