Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-24

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 885 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 885 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 885 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 885 of 2026 Krishna Kant Sharma .....Petitioner(s) Versus Smt. Sindhuja Mishra .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Naresh Kumar Pathak, Ajay Pratap Singh, Sachin Chaturvedi, Shailesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sharad Nandan Ojha Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri Naimish Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Naresh Kumar Pathak on behalf of the petitioner as well as Shri Sharad Nandan Ojha has appeared on behalf of opposite party. 2. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner had taken on rent a shop situated at APS Market, 11 Senani Vihar, near Sainik Dhaba, Raebareli Road, District Lucknow from the opposite party along with 9 other persons. 3. It has been stated that lease and license agreement was entered into between the petitioner on 01.09.2012, where it was agreed for rent of the said property, which was Rs. 1400/- per month. 4. It is a case of the petitioner that the opposite party has sought to dispossess the petitioner, due to which he had filed a suit for permanent injunction against the opposite party, in the court of Additional

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 885 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam