Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-25

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 787 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 787 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 787 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 787 of 2026 Gayasuddin And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Sri Digambar Jain Mandir Sitapur Thru. President Dharam Kumar Jain And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Chaturvedi, Amitabh Banerjee, Piyush Kumar Agarwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Birendra Narain Shukla, Rajneesh Kumar Verma Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Piyush Kumar Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Birendra Narain Shukla, learned counsel for respondent No. 1. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to respondent No. 2 is dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that the dispute in the present case was initiated by respondent No. 1 by filing an application U/S 21(1)(A) of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 alleging that he is the owner of the property situated at Gata No. 103 which was given on rent to the defendant therein, namely, Ram Kkilawan on a rent of Rs. 100/ per month. 4. It has been stated that on the disputed property there exists a Jain Temple within which a room was given on rent

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 787 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam