Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-26

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 3850 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 3850 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 3850 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3850 of 2026 Shiv Dutt .....Petitioner(s) Versus Gyan Singh And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sachida Nand Tripathi, Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for the defendant-petitioner. 2. In view of the order which is being proposed to be passed, notices are not being issued to the respondents. 3. The case of the defendant-petitioner is that proceedings under the Consolidation Act came to be instituted and the objections under Section 9A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holding Act, 1953 was decided by the Consolidation Officer on 02.02.2024 for recording the name of the plaintiff-respondent against which an appeal came to be preferred by the defendant-petitioner faction under Section 11(1) of U.P. CH Act in which an interim order was granted on 03.02.2024 which was vacated by the appellate court on 02.08.2024 against which, an appeal came to be preferred by the defendant-petitioner faction. A revision came to be preferred under Section 48 of the Act whereby an order came to be passed on 13.08.2024 setting

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 3850 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam