Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-25

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 1285 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 1285 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 1285 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1285 of 2026 Smt. Sunita And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Subhash And 13 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Bhanu Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri C.B. Singh on behalf of the petitioners. 2. In light of the proposed order, notices to private respondents, are dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are permanent resident of Village Bahadurpur Da. Jayas, Pargana Rokha, Tehsil Tiloi, District Amethi and the disputed property, which is subject matter of the disputed land of the petitioners. 4. It has been submitted that Shiv Balak (the plaintiff) had filed a suit for permanent injunction before the Civil Judge (J.D.), Dalmau, Raebareli against 4 people, namely, Smt. Chhanga, Smt. Piyara, Raja Ram and Babu Lal. It is during the suit proceedings that a written statement was filed on behalf of Raja Ram and Babu Lal i.e. defendants no. 3 and 4 stating that they do not have any right, interest and dispute in the property in question and give the statement in favour of opposite pa

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 1285 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam