Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-23

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 1216 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 1216 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 1216 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1216 of 2026 Smt. Sadhna Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) Versus Smt. Rukmani Rai .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rohit Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri Rohit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondent, is dispensed with. 3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the validity of the order dated 14.11.2025, passed by the District Judge, Lucknow, in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 326/2025, "Rukmini Rai Vs. Smt. Sadhna Srivastava", under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) C.P.C. 4. It has been submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the suit proceedings were initiated by private respondent in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hawali, Lucknow along with an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 C.P.C. 5. It has also been submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the opposite party had filed a suit before the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hawali, Lucknow, which was registered at Civil Suit No. 1252 of 2025 along with said suit an application un

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 1216 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam