Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-23

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 1123 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 1123 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 1123 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1123 of 2026 Abdul Hakeem And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Suhail Ahmad And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhakar Vardhan Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri P.V. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. In light of the proposed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted by counsel for the petitioners that the opposite parties had filed a suit for permanent injunction which is registered as Original Suit No. 2016 of 2012 (Suhail Ahmad Vs. Abdul Hakeem and others) along with the Suit an application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 C.P.C. had also filed. In the said suit proceedings, the petitioners are the defendants and had appeared and filed a written statement. In the written statement in paragraphs no. 4 and 17, they had stated that controversy with regard to the disputed land had already been settled previously in a suit initiated at the behest of the petitioners, which was registered at Original Suit No. 498 of 1985, which was decreed in favour of the petitioners, on 12.12.1991,

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 1123 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam