Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-03-18

KARAMJEET & ORS. vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-1993/2026 2026:DHC:2331
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
KARAMJEET & ORS.
Respondent
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~92 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 18th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 1993/2026 KARAMJEET & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nisha Sherawat and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Solanki, Advocates along with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP with SI Rajesh. Ms. Nisha Tokas, Advocate for R-2 along with the R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 54/2019 dated 02.02.2019, registered at Police Station Najafgarh, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) and petitioner No.1 was solemnized on 20.02.2015, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. There is no child born from such wedlock. 3. However, due to certain temperamental differences, they started living separately and on account of matrimonial discord, a complaint was lodged by respondent No.2, which resulted into registration of abovesaid FIR. 4. Charge-sheet has already been filed which was directed against four accused persons, one of whom has already expired. Charges are yet to be ascertained. Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 1993/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:19.03.2026 19:13:12 5. However, when the parties were referred to Delhi Mediation Centre, Dwarka, Delhi, on 11.11.2025, they came to amicable resolution of the matter and agreed to part ways in a graceful manner. 6. Respondent no. 2 is present in person and has been duly identified by her counsel as well as by Investigating Officer. 7. When asked, Respondent no. 2 reiterated the terms of settlement and submit

KARAMJEET & ORS. vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR · Niyam