Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-03-04

JIJABHAU DYANESHWAR TEMGIRE vs GANGARAM KHANDU TEMGIRE AND ORS

Citation / case number
WP/8080/2022
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
JIJABHAU DYANESHWAR TEMGIRE
Respondent
GANGARAM KHANDU TEMGIRE AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

1-WP-8080-2022.doc rrpillai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8080 OF 2022 Mr. Jijabhau Dyaneshwar Temgire … Petitioner Age : 50 Years, Occupation : Business R/a-Thorandale, Taluka – Ambegaon Dist - Pune Vs. 1. Mr. Gangaram Khandu Temgire Age : 33 years, Occupation : Business R/a-Thorandale, Taluka – Ambegaon Dist – Pune 2. Mr. Malini Shantaram Neharkar Age : 45 years, Occupation : Housewife R/a-Thorandale, Taluka – Ambegaon Dist – Pune 3. Mr. Vivek Arun Sathe Age : 31 years, Occupation : Service R/a – Sathe Chawl, Station Road Pimpri, Pune-18 4. Mr. Jeevan Jijabhau Temgire Age : Adult, Occupation : Business R/a-Thorandale, Taluka – Ambegaon Dist – Pune … Respondents Mr. Mateen Shaikh a/w. Mr. Shrinivas Kshirsagar, Mr. Parvez Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI Inamdar and Ms. Muskan Shaikh for the Petitioner. RAJESHWARI RAMESH RAMESH PILLAI PILLAI Date: 2026.03.04 14:39:04 +0530 Page no. 1 of 23 1-WP-8080-2022.doc Mr. P. J. Thorat i/b. Mr. Prabhanjan Gujar for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. RESERVED ON : 13th NOVEMBER 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 4th MARCH 2026 JUDGMENT: Basic Facts: 1. This petition is filed by defendant no. 1 to challenge the order passed by the trial court rejecting his application to produce documents to confront plaintiff no. 1 during his cross-examination. Respondent nos. 1 to 3 are the original plaintiffs who filed the suit for the cancellation of three sale deeds dated 3rd April 2012 and the deed of rectification dated 10th April 2012 executed by defendant no. 1 as a constituted attorney of the plaintiffs, in favour of defendant no. 2. The plaintiffs also prayed for a decree of injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the plaintiffs’ possession of the suit property and cre

JIJABHAU DYANESHWAR TEMGIRE vs GANGARAM KHANDU TEMGIRE AND ORS · Niyam