DEEPAK KUMAR MISHRA & ORS. vs STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 20.03.2026 + CRL.M.C. 2089/2026 & CRL.M.A. 8612/2026 DEEPAK KUMAR MISHRA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhishek Suman and Ms. Mohini Kumari, Advocates versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State Mr. Dharmender Kumar, Advocate for R2 with SI Amolak, South District CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 521/2018 of PS Swaroop Nagar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. Learned APP for State accepts notice and submits that State has no objection to this petition because parties have resumed matrimony. 3. Respondent no. 2 identified by IO/SI Amolak also accepts notice. CRL.M.C.2089/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb483 5d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2e Signature Not Verified ee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.03.20 17:45:02 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Date:20.03.2026 17:51:09 4. Keeping in mind nature of disputes between the parties I have spoken in Hindi with the parties. It is stated by them that since August 2025 they are living together happily along with daughter of petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2. The parties have brought their daughter also to the Court. 5. Respondent no. 2 submits that since now they are living happily together, she does not wish to continue prosecution of the petiti