Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-03-17

DATA TECHNOSYS(ENGINEERS) PVT. LTD. vs RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED

Citation / case number
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)-221/2026 2026:DHC:2256
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
DATA TECHNOSYS(ENGINEERS) PVT. LTD.
Respondent
RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 17.03.2026 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 221/2026, I.A. 6577/2026 (For Exemption) & I.A. 6578/2026 (For Delay 100 days in re-filing the petition) DATA TECHNOSYS(ENGINEERS) PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Love Kumar Gupta and Ms. Saumya Pandey, Advocates. versus RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Udit Seth and Mr. Divyanshu Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 29A (4) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 seeking extension of mandate or, substitution of the Sole Arbitrator appointed vide Order dated 17.04.2023 in ARB.P. 336/2023 seeking the following reliefs: “Allow the present petition for extending the mandate of the Ld. Sole Arbitrator appointed by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 17.04.2023 under Section 29A (4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for a further period of six months for the 1 Act 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that even assuming the judgment in Jagdeep Chowgule v. Sheela Chowgule2 holds t