Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-31

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 916 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 916 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 916 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 916 of 2026 X Juvenile .....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Amit Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Compliance affidavit has been filed by learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State. The same is taken on record. From perusal of the compliance affidavit, it transpires that notice has been served upon the informant but none has appeared on his/her behalf. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 18.11.2025 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act) Court No.1 Gorakhpur in Juvenile Criminal Appeal No.181 of 2025 (Delinquent Juvenile Vs. State of U.P. and others) and the order dated 15.10.2025 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Gorakhpur in Case No. 245 of 2025, under Sections- 137(2), 87, 65(1) B.N.S. and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Sikariganj District Gorakhpur. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the applicant w

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 916 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam