Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-19

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1894 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1894 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1894 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1894 of 2026 Sandeep Pandey And 3 Others .....Revisionist(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Janardan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 87 HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionists, learned AGA for the State and the learned counsel for opposite party no.2. 2. The present criminal revision has been filed against the impugned order dated 28.1.2026 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.3, Azamgarh in Session Trial No. 708 of 2023 ( State Vs. Sandeep Pandey and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 84 of 2018, under Section 308 IPC, Police Station Ahraula, District Azamgarh, whereby discharge application of the revisionists to discharge them under Section 308 IPC has been rejected by the learned trial court. 3. Learned counsel for the revisionists has submitted that impugned order passed by the learned trial court is wholly illegal and arbitrary. The trial court has committed grave illegality and material irregularity in passing the impugned order. He further submitted that the learned trial court has misre

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1894 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam