Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-24

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1133 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1133 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1133 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1133 of 2026 Juvenile X .....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Arun Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Gorakh Yadav, G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard Sri Arun Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Gorakh Yadav, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2/informant. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 16.01.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Farrukhabad in Juvenile Criminal Appeal No. 69 of 2025 (Juvenile N vs. State of U.P. and another), and the order dated 25.11.2025 passed by learned Juvenile Justice Board, Fatehgarh, Farrukhabad in Bail Application No. 2928/2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 144/2025, under Section 70(2), 115(2), 351(3) BNS, 5(g)/6 POCSO Act, and Section 3(1)(Da), 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, Police Station Kampil, District Farrukhabad. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile aged about 16 years, 4 months and 18 days on the date of al

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1133 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam