Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-30

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9682 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9682 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9682 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9682 of 2026 Rakesh Kushwaha .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manvendra Narain Pathak, Ram Krishna Paramhans Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Divyansh Rai, G.A. Court No. - 67 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Manvendra Narain Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Divyansh Rai, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri Anand Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 214 of 2024, under Sections- 103(1), 61(2)(A) BNS, Police Station-Bankata, District-Deoria, during the pendency of the trial. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant was neither named in the FIR nor in the statement of the first informant, and that the version given in the statement of the first informant is entirely different from the version mentioned in the FIR. It is further submitted that the only allegation against the applicant is that he conducted reiki prior to the incident i

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9682 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam