Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-30

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 10666 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 10666 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 10666 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10666 of 2026 Kriparam @ Tunde .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jitendra Kumar, Keshav Hari Dixit, Purushottam Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Sri Rahul Kumar Yadav, Advocate, has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. The same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party, and Sri Rahul Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the informant. 3. The present bail application has been filed with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 4 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 110, 351(3), 105 B.N.S., Police Station Chakar Nagar, District Etawah during the pendency of the trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The incident is alleged to have occurred on 08.01.2026, whereas the first information report was lodged belatedly on 10.01.2026 under Sections 115(2), 110, 351(3) B.N.S. The delay is fatal to the prosecution case. During

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 10666 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam