Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-25

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 10111 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 10111 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 10111 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10111 of 2026 Tirmal @ Roopkishor .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chanchal Kumari, Dinesh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Sri Yash Tandon and Sri Rajesh Kumar, Advocates, have filed their Parcha on behalf of the informant. The same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned AGA for the State-respondent, and Sri Yash Tandon, learned counsel for the informant. 3. The present bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 428 of 2025, under Sections 105, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 329(3), 191(2), 191(3), 190, BNS, Police Station Junawai, District Sambhal during the pendency of trial. 4. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The incident is alleged to have occurred on 06.11.2025. The first information report was lodged on 15.11.2025. The delay is fatal to the prosecution case. During investigation, Section 103(1) BNS was delete

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 10111 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam