Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-18

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 958 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 958 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 958 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 958 of 2026 Ajay Nishad .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Piyush Kumar, Vishal Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 50 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This criminal appeal has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant under Section 14-A (2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for setting aside the impugned order dated 05.06.2025 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST (P.A.) Act, Gorakhpur in Case Crime No. 982 of 2024, under Sections 109, 333 BNS and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST, P.S. Jhangha, District Gorakhpur. 3. As per the prosecution case, the daughter of the informant was attacked on her head by the accused with the intention to kill, as a result of which she sustained serious injuries. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant-applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR. It is further submitted that no

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 958 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam