Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-30

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 859 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 859 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 859 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 859 of 2026 Badri Prashad Dubey And 4 Others .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Abhinav Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Jeet Bahadur Singh, Vinod Kumar Pandey, G.A. Court No. - 53 HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party No.2. 2. The instant criminal appeal has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 10.1.2025 passed by the Special Judge, S.C./S.T. Act, Prayagraj as well as the entire proceeding in Special Session Trial No. 8/2025, arising out of case crime No. 463/2022, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(da) and 3(1)(dha) of S.C./S.T. Act, P.S Meja, District Prayagraj. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that applicant No.1 is 68 years old and appellant No.2 is 80 years old. The person, named in the F.I.R., Sushil Dubey has been exonerated. It is further submitted that the F.I.R. has been filed with a delay of eight days and there is contradiction between the complaint and the statement, recorded u/s 161 Cr.P.C. T

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 859 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam