Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-23

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1692 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1692 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1692 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1692 of 2026 Harinarayan Yadav .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Chandra Bhushan Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Santosh Kumar Singh Court No. - 50 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the informant is also present. 2. This criminal appeal has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant under Section 14-A (2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for setting aside the impugned order dated 02.02.2026 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST (P.A.) Act, Ghazipur in Case Crime No. 290 of 2025, under Sections 140(2), 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS and Section 3(1)(D), 3(1)(Dh), 3(2) 5A of SC/ST Act, P.S. Mardah, District Ghazipur. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant-applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant-applicant that there is delay of 13-14 hours in lodging of the FIR without there being any plausib

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1692 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam