Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-20

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1605 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1605 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1605 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1605 of 2026 Rudrabhan .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Arpit Pal, Manish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 50 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed by the appellant to set aside the bail rejection order dated 28.01.2026 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act) Prayagraj in Bail Application No.48 of 2026 arising out of Case Crime No.461 of 2025, under Sections 87, 137(2), 352 of BNS and Section 3(1)(Gha) and 3(2)(5) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Mauaima, District Prayagraj. 2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, the learned AGA for the State- respondent no.1 and perused the entire record. Despite service of notice, none has appeared on behalf of respondent no.2. 3. In short, the prosecution story is that the impugned FIR has been lodged by the informant alleging therein that her daughter aged about 18 years was enticed away by the appellant. 4. Submission of learned counsel for the appellant is that the appel

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1605 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam