Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-23

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1328 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1328 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1328 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1328 of 2026 Santosh Yadav @ Vichandi And 2 Others .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Chandra Prakash Misra, Sushil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 50 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. Learned AGA pointed out that notice has been served. 2. This criminal appeal has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant under Section 14-A (2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for setting aside the impugned order dated 12.01.2026 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST (P.A.) Act, Kushinagar in Case Crime No. 295 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 333, 324(4) BNS and Section 3(1)Da, 3(1)Dha of SC/ST Act, Police Station- Ramkola, District Kushinagar. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellants-applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that there is delay in lodging the FIR as the incident is said to have occurred on 3.07.2024 and the FI

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1328 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam