Delhi High Court · 2026-03-25
CA COOPERATIVE T/C SOCIETY LIMITED vs VIVEK KUMAR SINGH & ANR.
- Citation / case number
- W.P.(C)-12/2026 2026:DHC:2554-DB
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- CA COOPERATIVE T/C SOCIETY LIMITED
- Respondent
- VIVEK KUMAR SINGH & ANR.
Judgment text excerpt
$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 25th March, 2026 Uploaded on: 27th March, 2026 + W.P.(C) 12/2026 CA COOPERATIVE T/C SOCIETY LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, Ms. Nandini Aggarwal, Ms. Samiksha Advs. (M: 9990166622) versus VIVEK KUMAR SINGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Apoorv Rastogi, Adv. for R-1. (M: 8800838221) Mr. Anis Ahmad Adv. for R-2. (M: 9810965275) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 18710/2026 (for exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 12/2026 & CM APPL. 18709/2026 (for direction) 3. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner - CA Cooperative T/C Society Limited (hereinafter, the ‘Society’), challenging the impugned order of the Financial Commissioner, Delhi, dated 3rd November, 2025 (hereinafter, ‘the impugned order’) in Case No. 84/2024 & 85/2024, both titled ‘Vivek Kumar Singh v. CA Cooperative T/C Society Limited & Anr.’ 4. By the said impugned order, the Financial Commissioner has remanded W.P.(C) 12/2026 Page 1 of 8 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DEVANSHU JOSHI Signing Date:27.03.2026 17:33:29 the concerned case to the Registrar Co-operative Societies (hereinafter ‘RCS’) to consider the various pleas raised by the Respondent No. 1, who had stood as a surety in respect of the loan which was extended by the Society for a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- to one Arpit Singh (hereinafter, ‘the Principal Borrower’). The said loan facility was granted on 7th February, 2017. 5. Respondent No.1 is an employee of BSNL in Delhi. The background of the case is that the Principal Borrower had not repaid the money he had taken on loan