Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-26
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9849 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Citation / case number
- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9849 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Court
- Allahabad High Court
- Petitioner
- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9849 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Respondent
- Unknown
Judgment text excerpt
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9849 of 2026 Rajesh Yadav .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satyawan Yadav, Shiv Bahadur Singh, Surya Ditya Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the chargesheet dated 21.07.2015, cognizance/summoning order dated 09.06.2016 as well as entire proceedings of Case No.1289 of 2016 (State Vs. Rajesh Yadav and others), arising out of Case Crime no.1279 of 2011, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 406, 409, 120B IPC, P.S. Robertsganj, District- Sonbhadra, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonbhadra, including non-bailable warrant order dated 01.07.2025 and sanction order dated 10.03.2015. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant has challenged the impugned chargesheet along with cognizance/summoning order and entire proceedings of the present case precisely on the ground that Sections 420 and 406 IPC cannot go together in the same breat