Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-18

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9581 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9581 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9581 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9581 of 2026 Raju Yadav .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Sri Mahesh Kumar, holding brief of Sri Atul Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. The present application has been preferred for seeking quashing of entire proceeding of Case no. 3614 of 2020 (State vs. Raju Yadav and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 62 of 2020 under sections 419, 420, 406 IPC, PS- Kotwali, District Basti along with charge sheet dated 11.06.2020, cognizance/summoning order dated 19.10.2020. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant has challenged the impugned charge sheet along with cognizance/summoning order and entire proceedings of the present case precisely on the ground that Sections 420 and 406 IPC cannot go together in the same breath as per the proposition of law settled by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another reported in 2024

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9581 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam