Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-25

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6614 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6614 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6614 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 6614 of 2026 Rajiv Singhal And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, Pranjal Chaudhari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA for the State. 2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the chargesheet dated 23.06.2023 and cognizance/summoning order dated 03.10.2023 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.8021 of 2023 (State Vs. Rajiv Singhal and others), arising out of Case Crime no.889 of 2022, under Sections 406, 420, 468, 471, 504, 506, 34 IPC, P.S. Nandgram, District- Ghaziabad. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicants has challenged the impugned chargesheet along with cognizance/summoning order and entire proceedings of the present case precisely on the ground that Sections 420 and 406 IPC cannot go together in the same breath as per the proposition of law settled by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6614 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam