Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-30

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6439 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6439 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6439 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 6439 of 2026 Raju @ Vikram Singh .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application under section 528 BNSS has been preferred to quash the charge-sheet dated 25.12.2021 and cognizance/summoning order dated 21.11.2024 as well as the entire proceedings of S.T. No.2444 of 2024 (State vs. Raju @ Vikram Singh) out of Case Crime No.299 of 2021, under section 307 IPC, P.S. Makkhanpur, District- Firozabad, pending in the court of learned District Judge, Firozabad. 3. Learned counsel for applicant argued that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case by opposite party no.2 only to harass him since no offence as alleged, has ever been committed by him. It has also been argued by learned counsel for applicant that the instant matter is nothing but a counter-blast of case, which was registered by the wife of applicant against opposite party no.2 and there is no

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6439 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam