Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-23

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6378 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6378 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6378 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 6378 of 2026 Haseen Ahmad .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajatshatru Pandey, Vinod Kant Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the charge-sheet dated 02.02.2021 and cognizance/summoning order dated 24.06.2021 as well as entire proceedings of Case No.1159 of 2021 (State vs. Haseen Ahmad) arising out of Case Crime No.401 of 2020, under Sections 406, 420, 419, 506 IPC, P.S. Cantt., District- Prayagraj, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No.5, Allahabad. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant has challenged the impugned chargesheet along with cognizance/summoning order and entire proceedings of the present case precisely on the ground that Sections 420 and 406 IPC cannot go together in the same breath as per the proposition of law settled by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and o

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6378 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam